Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: as difficult as it is for us to stomach, the PAC-12 is better when USC is good ...

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by sancho View Post
    I agree with pretty much everything, but I would say that before we can talk about keeping pace, we have to catch up. The south power rankings right now (power rankings in terms of perception?):

    1) USC
    2) UCLA
    3) ASU
    4) Zona
    5) Utah
    6) CU

    We have to catch up a little. Right now, we worry about the USC, Stanford, Oregon games, but really it's the Arizona teams that should have a target on their back for us.

    If you are ranking the teams this year, I can't argue. But if you are viewing things through a 10-15 year prism, we are miles ahead of Arizona.
    “Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore.”
    André Gide

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by Jarid in Cedar View Post
    If you are ranking the teams this year, I can't argue. But if you are viewing things through a 10-15 year prism, we are miles ahead of Arizona.
    What if you are ranking since the start of the Pac-12?

    Or what if you are ranking based on public/media expectations over the next few years?

  3. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by sancho View Post
    What if you are ranking since the start of the Pac-12?

    Or what if you are ranking based on public/media expectations over the next few years?

    For the first 2 years of the Pac-12, I would go:

    1. USC
    2. UCLA
    3. ASU
    4. Utah
    5. Arizona
    6. Colorado

    We are 13-12 and 7-11 in conference. Arizona is 12-13 and 6-12 in conference. 1-1 head to head with each team winning on the road. If the top 3 don't change, then the winner of the Utah-Arizona game this year will have the edge in perception/expectations moving forward.
    “Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore.”
    André Gide

  4. #34
    Sam the Sheepdog LA Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    17,726
    FWIW, from the USC newsletter that I get:

    Haden's outlook for the 2013 football season...

    If you told me all 67 of our currently healthy and eligible scholarship guys will remain healthy, we could have a really good season. Injuries will happen, as they do in football, so depth is going to be the biggest question for us. I am optimistic though. I think our defense is really going to be a lot better from what I have seen. When I evaluated last season, everyone talks about offensive issues, but it was really defense. We lost games scoring 51 and 36 points. New defensive coordinator Clancy Pendergast has a different style, and with an influx of impact freshman on defense, I expect us to improve on that side of the ball.

    "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
    --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

    "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold."
    --Yeats

    “True, we [lawyers] build no bridges. We raise no towers. We construct no engines. We paint no pictures - unless as amateurs for our own principal amusement. There is little of all that we do which the eye of man can see. But we smooth out difficulties; we relieve stress; we correct mistakes; we take up other men's burdens and by our efforts we make possible the peaceful life of men in a peaceful state.”

    --John W. Davis, founder of Davis Polk & Wardwell

  5. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by LA Ute View Post
    FWIW, from the USC newsletter that I get:
    It works out alright for us, but relative to other schools, USC really got hosed on their sanctions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •