Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 121 to 150 of 157

Thread: Season Efficiency 2014-15

  1. #121

    Ucla 82-66 (ucla 69-59)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 17 -3.8
    Brandon Taylor 13 +0.2
    Jakob Poeltl 11 -2.8
    Brekkott Chapman 8 +0.8
    Dallin Bachnski 7 +1.6
    Dakarai Tucker 6 -1.2
    Chris Reyes 5 -1.9
    Kyle Kuzma 1 -2.7
    Isaiah Wright 1 -1.7
    Jordan Loveridge -2 -11.5
    Kenneth Ogbe -2 -6.4
    Jake Connor DNP
    Austin Eastman DNP
    Jeremy Olsen DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    Jordan Loverdige, I'm not putting all the blame on you for this game but you sure didn't help your case. Three missed shot from point blank? Why can't Jordan dribble in traffic? Does he dribble too high? It looks to me like he just dribbles blindly into a crowd sometimes. Nevertheless the entire team didn't play well. UCLA looked amped. UCLA looked prepared. The 1-2-2 defense confused Delon, that's not good. Corner threes beat a 1-2-2. Utah got back into this game when they started looking for the corner three. Plus they didn't run the baseline. The 2 guard is key in beating a 1-2-2 and when Taylor and Tucker finally realized that they did some damage...but it was too late.

    The bad...three players had a better game from the first match in Utah (Bach +3, Chapman +1, Kuzma +1) 7 players had worse games. As for UCLA they only had 2 players play worse and 6 players posted better efficiency scores from game 1 (Alford +21, Hamilton +15, Powell +13, Looney +6, Allen +6, Welsh +2). Bottom line UCLA wanted that game much more than Utah did. Utah allowed a season high in assists (15), committed turnovers (6), Fouls (11) and 2nd highest in Efficiency (82, Arizona 83), Points (69, Ball St 72), free throws made (18, Kansas 21) and field goal % (46.2% Arizona 49.1% ). Utah had season lows in free throws made (6), attempted (9) and steals (2). Overall Utah played a lazy game. Utah has allowed over 42% from the field in the past 4 games. Safe to say Poeltl being hurt doesn't help.

    The good...Utah did hold UCLA to only 1 block (third time this season) Utah was +5 on blocks and UCLA only shot 23.1% from deep 3/13. Utah did attempt 22 threes which is over their average of 18.6 but a lot of that was due to being down most of the game. That's about the only good that came from this game.

    Bring on the Trojans.

  2. #122

    Top 25 performances versus Utah

    Player Team FG FT 3P Reb Ast Stl Blk TO Pts Eff
    1 Robert Upshaw Washington 6/8 1/3 0/0 9 1 0 5 1 13 23
    2 Sean Sellers Ball State 8/13 6/6 4/6 2 1 1 0 2 26 23
    3 Stanley Johnson @Arizona 6/12 5/7 1/2 9 1 2 0 1 18 21
    4 Norman Powell @UCLA 9/16 5/6 0/3 4 1 2 0 2 23 20
    5 Kyle Collinsworth @BYU 7/15 2/5 1/2 9 5 1 1 2 17 20
    6 TJ McConnell @Arizona 8/10 0/2 0/1 3 6 1 0 2 16 20
    7 Perry Ellis @Kansas 5/7 3/4 1/1 6 3 1 2 4 14 19
    8 Andrew Andrews Washington 7/14 3/3 5/6 2 2 1 0 2 22 18
    9 Brandon Ashley @Arizona 6/9 2/3 0/1 8 0 0 1 1 14 18
    10 Christian Wood @UNLV 4/10 0/0 0/1 13 1 2 2 3 8 17
    11 JJ O'Brien @San Diego St 3/10 6/6 0/1 11 3 1 0 3 12 17
    12 Tyler Haws @BYU 9/22 2/3 3/5 8 1 0 1 2 23 17
    13 Malik Martin USC 6/10 0/2 2/3 6 1 1 1 1 14 16
    14 Bryce Alford @UCLA 4/12 4/4 2/6 3 7 2 0 2 14 16
    15 Jamari Traylor @Kansas 4/8 5/5 0/0 5 0 2 1 1 13 16
    16 Tekele Cotton Wichita St 4/8 3/4 3/5 3 1 2 1 1 14 15
    17 Shaquille Boga Texas-PanAm 5/9 4/4 2/4 3 2 1 0 3 16 15
    18 Ron Baker Wichita St 6/13 0/0 3/6 6 1 1 0 2 15 14
    19 Josh Hawkinson Washington St 3/10 6/8 0/2 10 0 0 1 0 12 14
    20 Cody Larson S Dakota St 5/10 2/3 1/1 6 2 1 0 2 13 14
    21 Frank Mason III @Kansas 2/5 4/4 2/3 2 5 2 1 3 10 14
    22 Anson Winder @BYU 4/8 0/0 2/5 4 2 2 0 0 10 14
    23 Savon Goodman @Arizona St 4/6 1/2 0/0 10 0 1 0 3 9 14
    24 Reed Tellinghuisen S Dakota St 3/7 4/4 2/5 4 0 1 1 1 12 13
    25 Jamel Waters Alabama St 6/11 3/4 4/6 3 1 0 0 4 19 13
    Isaac Hamilton @UCLA 4/7 2/3 1/2 4 3 0 0 1 11 13
    Kevon Looney @UCLA 2/6 3/4 0/1 6 2 3 0 0 7 13

  3. #123

    Utah 90 USC 20 (Utah 67-39)

    Yes that is correct. USC scored a 20 for efficiency. That was the 4th time a team scored less than 30 efficiency vs Utah this season (28 UCLA game 1, 27 Texas-Pan America, 26 UC Riverside, 20 @USC)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Jakob Poeltl 25 (10th) +10.5
    Delon Wright 13 -7.4
    Brandon Taylor 12 -0.8
    Jordan Loveridge 10 +0.4
    Chris Reyes 8 +1.0
    Kyle Kuzma 7 +3.2
    Dakarai Tucker 6 -1.1
    Dallin Bachynski 5 -0.4
    Brekkott Chapman 3 -4.0
    Jeremy Olsen 3 +1.4
    Austin Eastman 0 -0.4
    Isaiah Wright -1 -3.5
    Kenneth Ogbe -2 -6.0
    Jake Connor DNP
    Eric Winder DNP

    Welcome back Jakob, 10th highest efficiency score for the season.. Pure domination inside and single handedly beating USC by himself. USC shot 26.5% and a lot of that had to do with Poeltl being back. A lot of season lows and highs in this game. See below.

    The good.... Speaking of the 26.5%, that was a season low for a Utah opponent. The first UCLA game they shot 28.8%. Today's game brought the Utah opponent FG% to 37.8%. USC also went 1/12 from deep for 8.3% second only to 1/13 Riverside 7.7%. The 20 efficiency was a season low (mentioned above) and the 39 points ties a season low (UCLA game 1). USC only made 13 shots (new low) and only 4 assists (season low tied with San Diego State). As for Utah they shot a season high 13/15 86.7% from the free throw line. This brings the Ute average up to 68.8% for the season 326/474. Utah had 28 defensive rebounds +3 over average and 9 steals +2 over average.

    The bad....Utah did allow 19 free throw attempts +2 average, but only committed 15 fouls -1 average. Utah was 4/20 from deep for 20%, not a season low but not great nonetheless. That's about it for the negative. Utah played a great game coming off that loss.
    Last edited by The Thrill; 02-01-2015 at 02:59 PM.

  4. #124

    Utah season statistics

    G FG FG% FT FT% 3P 3P% Reb Ast Stl Blk TO Pts Eff
    Wright, Delon 21 106/196 54.1% 79/99 79.8% 12/42 28.6% 4.4 5.6 2.2 0.8 1.9 14.4 20.4
    Poeltl, Jakob 20 76/114 66.7% 31/68 45.6% 0/1 0.0% 7.7 0.6 0.6 1.9 1.8 9.2 14.4
    Taylor, Brandon 21 74/156 47.4% 33/37 89.2% 45/99 45.5% 2.6 3.4 1.5 0.0 1.4 10.8 12.8
    Loveridge, Jordan 14 44/106 41.5% 30/36 83.3% 29/63 46.0% 3.6 0.8 0.6 0.1 1.3 10.5 9.6
    Tucker, Dakarai 17 48/107 44.9% 15/23 65.2% 27/74 36.5% 2.3 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.7 8.1 7.1
    Chapman, Brekkott 21 50/93 53.8% 29/40 72.5% 12/24 50.0% 2.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.1 6.7 7.0
    Reyes, Chris 21 39/76 51.3% 21/39 53.8% 1/2 50.0% 4.2 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 4.8 7.0
    Bachynski, Dallin 21 27/47 57.4% 30/40 75.0% 0/1 0.0% 2.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 4.0 5.4
    Ogbe, Kenneth 16 26/64 40.6% 18/27 66.7% 14/37 37.8% 1.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.0 5.3 4.0
    Kuzma, Kyle 21 25/55 45.5% 19/33 57.6% 8/24 33.3% 1.9 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.7 3.7 3.8
    Wright, Isaiah 21 11/31 35.5% 8/11 72.7% 8/22 36.4% 0.6 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.9 1.8 2.5
    Olsen, Jeremy 16 8/26 30.8% 9/15 60.0% 0/0 - 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.6 1.6
    Eastman, Austin 15 1/6 16.7% 4/6 66.7% 1/3 33.3% 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4
    Connor, Jake 0 0/0 - 0/0 - 0/0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Winder, Eris 0 0/0 - 0/0 - 0/0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Pssst.... Delon Wright averages 20.4 efficiency....USC as a team only scored a 20 vs Utah today. Something to think about considering Utah's defense.

  5. #125

    Utah 109 Colorado 37 (Utah 79-51)

    Welcome back Jordan Loveridge. Loveridge was a +20 from the first Colorado game. -1 to 19.

    Player Efficiency +-/
    Brandon Taylor 21 +7.8
    Jordan Loveridge 19 +8.8
    Delon Wright 15 -5.1
    Jakob Poeltl 14 -0.3
    Kyle Kuzma 12 +7.8
    Chris Reyes 9 +2.0
    Jeremy Olsen 5 +3.2
    Dallin Bachynski 4 -1.4
    Brekkott Chapman 4 -2.9
    Isaiah Wright 3 +0.5
    Kenneth Ogbe 1 -2.8
    Dakarai Tucker 1 -5.8
    Austin Eastman 0 -0.4
    Jake Connor DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    What an impressive game. Even with Delon going 2/7 from the field he still finished with 15 efficiency points. As for Loveridge he was everywhere. 4/7 from the field 10 rebounds, that gets it done. Then there is Taylor. Every week I think he's going to come back to Earth and every week he impresses me, easily the most underrated player in the conference. 6/9 from the field all three's. 6 assists and only 1 turnover. Color me impressed.

    The bad...Utah committed 24 personal fouls, easily the highest for the season. Averaging 16.5 fouls per game. This translated to Colorado going 22/36 from the free throw line...both season highs for a Utah opponent. Utah opponents have been averaging 11/17 from the line. Colorado only created 9 turnovers, they actually played a really good game efficiently....until you see their shooting. Utah had only 3 offensive rebounds (tied a season low, UNLV) but a lot of that had to do with Utah shooting 58% from the field. Lastly, Utah only took 45 shots, 6 under their average but still scored 79, 5 over their average.

    The good...there was a lot of good. USC only made 13 shots (season low), Colorado made 14 (second lowest). Utah defense is hot right now. 27/96 28% over the last two game from the field. 2/21 from deep 9.5%. On the other side Utah was on fire from the field. In the last two games Utah is 51/99 51.5% and 17/44 from deep. The 13 made behind the arc tonight was a season high. Utah also had a season high in defensive rebounds (33) +8 off average. Utah was +15 in assists and +48% from behind the arc. The +72 efficiency was the 5th highest this season and the second time in the past two games Utah was +70 in efficiency. FYI Utah was -16 vs UCLA. Utah averages +38.9 efficiency for the season and +18.1 in points. Utah has beaten 12 of their 22 games by 20 or more points...leads the nation.

  6. #126

    Utah 91 Stanford 53 (Utah 75-59)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 19 -1.1
    Dallin Bachynski 14 +8.3
    Brekkott Chapman 14 +6.8
    Jordan Loveridge 10 -0.2
    Chris Reyes 9 +1.9
    Brandon Taylor 9 -4.0
    Dakarai Tucker 6 -0.7
    Jakob Poeltl 5 -8.9
    Kenneth Ogbe 3 -0.8
    Isaiah Wright 0 -2.4
    Jake Connor DNP
    Austin Eastman DNP
    Kyle Kuzma DNP
    Jeremy Olsen DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    5 DNP's is telling me that Coach K is narrowing it down to 8-9 main players. Kuzma has been slowing getting less and less time every game. I've heard that it's because he doesn't understand their defensive movements. Sad because the guy has all the offensive talent in the world.

    The good...not a lot of big numbers to stand out vs Stanford because it was an average 15+ win for Utah, most of the numbers were in line with their season averages...which is a very good thing. Utah shot 83.3% from the line 20/24. Since the USC awful 50% free throw game Utah has been shooting 76.6% 144/188 from the line. If that was the constant for the season Utah would be ranked #7 in the country in free throw percentage. The 20 made free throws was the first time since Arizona State Utah made over 20. Averaging 15.7 for the season made. Utah was +6 on assists 14-8 and Utah held their opponent under 10 assists for the third straight game. The 3 Stanford steals was 3 under what Utah was giving up.

    The bad....again, not much to get upset about. If I had to choose something it was going 5/15 from deep for 33.3% which was 7% under their average. Stanford actually shot well from deep at 42.9% 6/14 but it wasn't enough. That's about it. Utah looked very good in the second half and put it away.

  7. #127

    Utah 85 California 60 (Utah 76-61)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Jakob Poeltl 23 +8.7
    Delon Wright 20 -0.1
    Brandon Taylor 14 +1.0
    Dakarai Tucker 11 +4.1
    Chris Reyes 8 +0.8
    Brekkott Chapman 4 -3.1
    Jordan Loveridge 3 -6.8
    Dallin Bachynski 1 -4.5
    Austin Eastman 0 -0.4
    Isaiah Wright 0 -2.3
    Kyle Kuzma -1 -5.0
    Kenneth Ogbe -1 -4.5
    Jake Connor DNP
    Jeremy Olsen DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    Jakob is back. 23 efficiency ties him for the 11th best performance by a Ute on the season. With that said Tyrone Wallace also scored a 23 and marked the third time this season a Ute opponent scored a 23 efficiency, all at the JMHC. Jabari Bird also ranked in the top 25 opponent scores with 18 for 9th best. In fact, those two really played great...bad news for Cal is the other 7 guys didn't do squat.

    The good...Utah forced 26 fouls (averaging 20.3) for the 4th most for a Utah opponent. Utah also only allowed 3 steals for the second straight game. Cal was only 5/12 from the free throw line for 41.7% which is the 2nd worst for a Utah opponent, USC 40% 2/5. Utah had 7 blocks for the first time since game 5, averaging 4.9. The 7 Utah turnovers is second best on the season (3 Washington St). Utah was 72.4% from the free throw line at 21/29 both better than season averages of 16/23. Utah is now 69.4% on the season. Utah needs to make their next 11 free throws to reach 70% on the season. If Utah shoots 52% for the next 3 games they should reach 50%, right now at 49.7%. Utah took 54 shots for the 8 time in 24 games, averaging 51.1 shots per game.

    The bad...Utah had a very low 18.5% of assists to shot attempted ratio. Only 3 times has Utah been worse (SDSt, BYU, Kansas and UNLV). Utah only had 3 steals, which probably led to the minimal foul shots from Cal. They also only shot 44.4% from the field, which was the first time Utah shot worse than 45% since the Arizona game. Cal actually shot the ball well vs Utah. The 26 makes tied a season high for a Utah opponent (Arizona) and the 45.6% from the field was the 4th best against Utah. Utah has allowed 68 rebounds in the past two games after they were allowing 27.8 a game in the previous 4.

  8. #128

    Top 25 performances versus Utah

    Player Team FG FT 3P Reb Ast Stl Blk TO Pts Eff
    1 Sean Sellers Ball State 8/13 6/6 4/6 2 1 1 0 2 26 23
    2 Tyrone Wallace California 11/15 2/7 2/3 7 2 1 0 4 26 23
    3 Robert Upshaw Washington 6/8 1/3 0/0 9 1 0 5 1 13 23
    4 Stanley Johnson @Arizona 6/12 5/7 1/2 9 1 2 0 1 18 21
    5 TJ McConnell @Arizona 8/10 0/2 0/1 3 6 1 0 2 16 20
    6 Kyle Collinsworth @BYU 7/15 2/5 1/2 9 5 1 1 2 17 20
    7 Norman Powell @UCLA 9/16 5/6 0/3 4 1 2 0 2 23 20
    8 Perry Ellis @Kansas 5/7 3/4 1/1 6 3 1 2 4 14 19
    9 Brandon Ashley @Arizona 6/9 2/3 0/1 8 0 0 1 1 14 18
    10 Jabari Bird California 10/14 0/0 1/2 1 0 0 1 1 21 18
    11 Andrew Andrews Washington 7/14 3/3 5/6 2 2 1 0 2 22 18
    12 Tyler Haws @BYU 9/22 2/3 3/5 8 1 0 1 2 23 17
    13 JJ O'Brien @San Diego St 3/10 6/6 0/1 11 3 1 0 3 12 17
    14 Christian Wood @UNLV 4/10 0/0 0/1 13 1 2 2 3 8 17
    15 Jamari Traylor @Kansas 4/8 5/5 0/0 5 0 2 1 1 13 16
    16 Bryce Alford @UCLA 4/12 4/4 2/6 3 7 2 0 2 14 16
    17 Malik Martin USC 6/10 0/2 2/3 6 1 1 1 1 14 16
    18 Shaquille Boga Texas-PanAm 5/9 4/4 2/4 3 2 1 0 3 16 15
    19 Tekele Cotton Wichita St 4/8 3/4 3/5 3 1 2 1 1 14 15
    20 Savon Goodman @Arizona St 4/6 1/2 0/0 10 0 1 0 3 9 14
    21 Anson Winder @BYU 4/8 0/0 2/5 4 2 2 0 0 10 14
    22 Frank Mason III @Kansas 2/5 4/4 2/3 2 5 2 1 3 10 14
    23 Cody Larson S Dakota St 5/10 2/3 1/1 6 2 1 0 2 13 14
    24 Marcus Allen Stanford 5/9 1/2 2/3 5 2 1 0 2 13 14
    25 Josh Hawkinson Washington St 3/10 6/8 0/2 10 0 0 1 0 12 14
    Ron Baker Wichita St 6/13 0/0 3/6 6 1 1 0 2 15 14
    Last edited by The Thrill; 02-16-2015 at 06:48 PM.

  9. #129

    Top 25 Utah performances

    Player Opponent Efficiency
    1 Poeltl, Jakob North Dakota 35
    2 Wright, Delon Alabama State 35
    3 Wright, Delon South Dakota St 33
    4 Wright, Delon @Kansas 30
    5 Wright, Delon Washington State 29
    6 Wright, Delon North Dakota 28
    7 Taylor, Brandon Washington State 28
    8 Wright, Delon @BYU 27
    9 Wright, Delon Ball State 25
    10 Poeltl, Jakob @USC 25
    11 Taylor, Brandon @UNLV 23
    12 Wright, Delon @Arizona State 23
    13 Poeltl, Jakob California 23
    14 Kuzma, Kyle Cal-Riverside 22
    15 Wright, Delon UCLA 22
    16 Taylor, Brandon Ball State 21
    17 Taylor, Brandon @Colorado 21
    18 Kuzma, Kyle UT Pan American 20
    19 Wright, Delon Carroll College 20
    20 Taylor, Brandon Colorado 20
    21 Wright, Delon California 20
    22 Chapman, Brekkott Cal-Riverside 19
    23 Chapman, Brekkott South Dakota St 19
    24 Tucker, Dakarai Washington 19
    25 Loveridge, Jordan @Colorado 19
    Wright, Delon Stanford 19

  10. #130

    Utah 56 Oregon State 38 (Utah 47-37)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 16 -3.9
    Dakarai Tucker 10 +2.9
    Brandon Taylor 9 -3.9
    Brekkott Chapman 9 +1.8
    Jakob Poeltl 5 -8.9
    Jordan Loveridge 3 -6.4
    Jeremy Olsen 3 +1.2
    Chris Reyes 2 -5.0
    Dallin Bachynski 0 -5.3
    Kenneth Ogbe 0 -3.4
    Kyle Kuzma -1 -4.8
    Jake Connor DNP
    Austin Eastman DNP
    Eris Winder DNP
    Isaiah Wright DNP

    This was a big one Utah had to win and they did. Tucker, Chapman and Olsen really provided a lift when Utah needed it. It's tough to get positive efficiency off average when on the road...more on that later.

    The good....Utah only had 11 fouls. They played really solid defence. Oregon State was only 3/8 from the line at 37.5% which was a season low for a Utah opponent. That free throw defense was on point last night. The 37 points was also a season low for a Utah opponent. The Beavers also only shot 13.3% from deep, 2/15. Oregon State only played 7 guys last night and two (Payton and Duvivier) played all 40 minutes. Utah was right on their averages for rebounding and three pointers but low in free throws and field goals.

    The bad....those lows were season lows. This game was very similar to the UCLA game from an opponents perspective. Utah has shot 6/9 from the line twice (OSU and UCLA). The 40 shot attempts was a season low for Utah (averaging 50.7). The 47 points was a season low, averaging 73.2. 2 steals tied a season low, only forced 4 fouls (season low, average 12.2) and Utah was -9 in turnovers, which probably kept Oregon State in the game. Utah was +8 on the defensive boards which was the main reason Utah began to pull away at the end.

    Tough game but a great win. Bring on the Ducks!

  11. #131

    Home vs Road efficiency

    Every single player on the Utah team sees a decline in their efficiency score on the road. There was a lot of talk about Loveridge having a huge decline when playing on the road. For his minutes he's actually not that bad, just more noticeable since he plays 24 minutes per game. Below are the

    Player Home Road Diff Off Avg Min/G
    Brekkott Chapman 7.9 7.1 -0.8 -10.7% 16.4
    Delon Wright 21.7 17.7 -4.0 -19.9% 32.5
    Jakob Poeltl 15.1 11.3 -3.8 -27.6% 23.4
    Chris Reyes 7.7 5.8 -1.9 -27.8% 16.2
    Brandon Taylor 13.9 10.1 -3.8 -29.8% 29.4
    Dallin Bachynski 6.5 4.6 -1.9 -35.1% 12.2
    Jordan Loveridge 10.4 6.6 -3.8 -40.4% 23.6
    Dakarai Tucker 9.3 4.7 -4.7 -65.8% 20.6
    Jeremy Olsen 2.1 0.8 -1.3 -68.6% 6.7
    Kyle Kuzma 4.7 1.3 -3.4 -90.2% 8.8
    Kenneth Ogbe 4.9 1.3 -3.7 -109.5% 13.8
    Isaiah Wright 3.3 0.4 -2.8 -121.0% 12.3
    Austin Eastman 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -130.8% 2.2
    Eris Winder
    Jake Connor

    In case this doesn't make sense here's the breakdown. Obviously the "Home" and "Road" columns are the players efficiency average score in those games. Like I said not one player has a better average on the road. The "Off Average" column is the percentage off of their season average. i.e. Delon Wright is averaging 19.9 efficiency and is -4 on the road, the % off his average is down 19.9% on the road. The players are ranked by this column. I listed the minutes per game to reflect how big of an impact it is.

    As you can see Chapman and Wright stay the closest to their averages on the road, only a 20% decrease on the road. Loveridge and Tucker have the largest drop of players averaging over 20 minutes at 40% and 66% decreases on the road. The argument is there that they underperform on the road but it's also more apparent since they play more minutes.

  12. #132

    Oregon 79 Utah 59 (Oregon 69-58)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 25 +4.9
    Dakarai Tucker 11 +3.7
    Chris Reyes 8 +1.0
    Brekkott Chapman 4 -3.0
    Jordan Loveridge 4 -5.1
    Jeremy Olsen 4 +2.1
    Jakob Poeltl 4 -9.5
    Kenneth Ogbe 1 -2.2
    Brandon Taylor 0 -12.4
    Dallin Bachynski -2 -7.0
    Kyle Kuzma -2 -5.5
    Jake Connor DNP
    Austin Eastman DNP
    Eris Winder DNP
    Isaiah Wright DNP

    Brandon Taylor was shut down. Give Oregon credit, they did exactly what they needed to to win. Delon Wright probably learned today that he needs to just take the game over. Several times Delon passed up on driving to the hoop and instead passed out to an open player. The unselfish play but in the end actually hurt the team.

    The good...Oregon had 2 blocks, that was the only category that was deficient for a Ute opponent. The one shining stat and new record for the season was 29 three point attempts...not great when they only make 8. Utah did have 7 steals which was above their season average

    The bad...The Utes...they were deficient in 10 categories. 58 points was 4th worst on the season. 19 shots made was 4th worst on the season. 14 turnovers was tied for 4th worst in the season. 36.5% shooting was 2nd worst on the season. 27.6% from three was 5th worst on the season. The 19.2% of assists to shots was 6th worst on the season. 59 efficiency was the 4th worst on the season. Oregon 79 points was the third most Utah has given up all year (Arizona 83 and UCLA 82). Oregon committed 13 fouls, 7 under the Utah average, the 2nd best for a Utah opponent. Bottom line is Utah didn't get the calls and didn't go to the line. Utah was 12/17 from the line just under their average but the big factor is they didn't force Oregon to adjust due to foul trouble. Brooks had 4 fouls as the only player in foul trouble. Utah has forced 14 foul outs this year in 26 games. 35 times in 26 games they had a player with 4 fouls, again, Utah didn't force the issue.

    Utah still has a chance at a share of the conference regular season title and even a #1 seed...but they aren't in control any more.

    Bring on the Sun Devils....6 days to the rematch!

  13. #133

    Utah 116 Arizona St 25 (Utah 83-41)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 21 +0.9
    Jakob Poeltl 16 +2.4
    Isaiah Wright 12 +9.3
    Kenneth Ogbe 11 +7.4
    Jordan Loveridge 9 -0.1
    Kyle Kuzma 9 +5.3
    Chris Reyes 9 +1.9
    Brandon Taylor 9 -3.3
    Dakarai Tucker 9 +1.7
    Brekkott Chapman 6 -1.0
    Jeremy Olsen 3 +1.0
    Austin Eastman 0 -0.3
    Dallin Bachynski -1 -5.8
    Jake Connor DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    9 players at 9 or better? If you've been following this stat a couple of years ago Utah would have been happy to have 2 guys reach double figures. Absolute domination tonight. It was nice to see Isaiah Wright and Ogbe...and Kuzma all up there towards the top. I was just calling out Ogbe for not doing anything recently and Isaiah Wright hadn't hardly played in the last 4 games. Isaiah reached his season high tonight with 12.

    First the good...Obviously 11 blocks...10 in the first half. Utah made 31 shots tonight, 3rd best for the season. The 116 efficiency was the second highest this year (125 Riverside). Utah shot 63.3% from the field +14% off their average and 57.1% from deep +17% off average. The 11 blocks were a season high and the 0 blocks given up were a season low. Utah also had 8 steals and only 9 turnovers. ASU actually had an ok game, they just couldn't shoot. 14 turnovers isn't bad, especially vs Utah. ASU shot 28% 14/50 and 18.8% 3/16 from deep, marks the 5th time Utah held an opponent under 30%.

    The bad...ASU and Oregon combined to shoot 25/31 from the line and 81%. Utah opponents have been averaging 64%, some of this goes to better teams shooting better but some comes to their opponents not being tired. Utah only attempted 14 three pointers, this coming off of 29 attempts vs Oregon, Utah did shoot 57% vs ASU. Utah only shot 65% from the line 13/20 and still needs to improve, although recently they've done better.

    That's about it...Domination...do it again vs Arizona and the world will be perfect.

  14. #134

    Worst 25 performances vs Utah

    Player Team FG FT 3P Reb Ast Stl Blk TO Pts Eff
    1 Jordan McLaughlin @USC 0/7 0/0 0/2 2 0 0 0 3 0 -8
    2 Tra Holder Arizona State 0/5 0/0 0/1 0 1 0 0 3 0 -7
    3 Bryce Alford UCLA 0/10 0/0 0/4 1 5 0 1 2 0 -5
    4 Landen Lucas @Kansas 0/2 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 0 2 0 -4
    5 Mike Lopez Texas-PanAm 0/3 0/0 0/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3
    6 Elijah Watson Texas-PanAm 0/1 1/2 0/0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -3
    7 Skyler Flatten S Dakota St 1/7 0/0 0/2 1 0 0 0 0 2 -3
    8 Lorel Johnson Carroll 1/4 0/0 1/1 1 0 0 0 4 3 -3
    9 Dakarai Allen @San Diego St 0/4 0/0 0/0 1 0 0 0 0 0 -3
    10 Olaf Schaftenaar @Oregon St 1/9 0/0 1/8 2 1 0 0 1 3 -3
    11 Isaac Neilson @BYU 0/3 0/0 0/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3
    12 Tra Holder @Arizona St 0/3 0/0 0/0 2 2 0 0 3 0 -2
    12 Bo Barnes @Arizona St 0/4 0/0 0/3 1 1 0 0 0 0 -2
    12 Xavier Talton @Colorado 0/4 3/4 0/2 1 0 1 0 2 3 -2
    12 Nikola Javanovic @USC 1/5 1/2 0/0 2 0 0 0 2 3 -2
    12 Sam Singer California 0/3 0/1 0/1 2 3 0 0 3 0 -2
    12 Ryan Imhoff Carroll 0/5 0/0 0/3 2 0 2 0 1 0 -2
    12 Tory Miller Colorado 0/0 1/2 0/0 1 0 0 0 3 1 -2
    12 Shane Benton North Dakota 0/1 0/0 0/1 0 0 0 0 1 0 -2
    12 Moe McDonald Texas-PanAm 0/1 0/2 0/1 1 0 0 0 0 0 -2
    12 Isaac Hamilton UCLA 1/7 0/0 0/3 1 1 1 0 1 2 -2
    12 Jaylen Bland UC-Riverside 2/8 0/0 0/2 1 1 0 0 2 4 -2
    12 Taylor Johns UC-Riverside 1/11 0/0 0/0 5 2 0 1 2 2 -2
    12 Colin Gruber UC-Riverside 0/2 0/0 0/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2
    12 Donaven Dorsey Washington 0/3 0/0 0/2 1 0 1 0 1 0 -2
    12 Junior Longrus Washington St 0/0 0/2 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2
    12 Eric Jacobsen Arizona State 0/1 0/1 0/0 1 0 0 0 1 0 -2
    12 Jonathan Gilling Arizona State 0/2 0/0 0/2 1 0 0 0 1 0 -2

  15. #135
    Administrator U-Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,526
    How to read a negative efficiency? Is 0 an "average" and the player is actually hurting the team when they are in negative territory?

  16. #136
    Quote Originally Posted by U-Ute View Post
    How to read a negative efficiency? Is 0 an "average" and the player is actually hurting the team when they are in negative territory?
    I haven't really zeroed it down to the number but in a nutshell
    +20 = All-American levels
    10-20 = solid performance, didn't hurt the team
    5-9 = depending on the amount of playing time giving good contribution (average)
    0-4 = didn't help or hurt the team
    negative = very bad performance.

    As you can see, Tra Holder last night was 0/5 shooting giving him -5 points. Then he had 3 turnovers moving him to -8 points. His one positive was the assist that moved him back to -7 total. No rebounds, no steals, no blocks, he essentially did nothing but miss 5 shots and turn the ball over 3 times.

    Sometimes a player can have a really nice game on paper but a horrible efficiency. Fred VanFleet for Wichita State had 13 points, 4 assists and 3 rebounds vs Utah but he was 5/19 from the field and had 2 turnovers which dropped him to a efficiency score of only 3. Essentially he hurt his team by missing so many shots -14.

    To answer your question anything below 5 is really not helping the team, but that's not always the case. A player can score well efficiently with limited minutes, most of what gets Kuzma higher totals is he doesn't turn the ball over and doesn't shoot a lot and he gets a lot of rebounds.

  17. #137

    Arizona 72 Utah 60 (Arizona 63-57)

    Player Efficiency +/-
    Delon Wright 22 +1.8
    Dallin Bachynski 11 +6.0
    Jordan Loveridge 11 +1.8
    Jakob Poeltl 6 -7.3
    Isaiah Wright 6 +3.2
    Brandon Taylor 2 -9.9
    Brekkott Chapman 0 -6.8
    Dakarai Tucker -1 -8.0
    Jeremy Olsen -2 -3.8
    Chris Reyes -3 -9.7
    Jake Connor DNP
    Austin Eastman DNP
    Kyle Kuzma DNP
    Kenneth Ogbe DNP
    Eris Winder DNP

    Give it up for Loveridge and Bachynski, they actually played really well last night, and Isaiah Wright...even though he dropped the ball on the 1 yard line and gave up an easy put back... more on that later. Arizona is that good. Efficiency speaking Utah did a great job of taking out players who did well against them in game 1. Stanley Johnson was not the same player and dropped his efficiency from 21 to 7 last night. TJ McConnell went from a 20 in Tucscon to a 9 last night. Brandon Ashley went from an 18 to an 8. The problem is Utah couldn't stop Tarczewski who went up from 6 to 16. Hollis-Jefferson went from an 8 to 13 and Gabe York went from -1 to 13. Utah stopped three guys but couldn't stop the other 3...they're just too much to handle.

    The good....Dallin Bachynski was +13 from game 1 to last night and Delon was +10. Isaiah Wright stepped it up and played well since they completely shut down Brandon Taylor. Delon's 22 was the 17th best performance of the season for a Ute. Utah held Arizona to only 16.7% from deep 2/12 and only 3 steals. Arizona shot 33.3% 17/51 which typically is good enough for a win. Arizona still owns the best shooting performance vs Utah at 49.1% so this was a huge difference. Utah was 76.2% from the line 16/21 and they were +4 in assists. Those were the good things.

    Now, the bad.... Rebounding. As defensive rebounding goes, so do the Utes. Utah was +7 on defensive boards vs allowing offensive boards. +7 is a terrible score, the only game worse was the -2 at Arizona. Utah averages +15 with this. In fact, no team should ever be negative in this category. Fundamentally the defense has the advantage on the defensive boards because they should already be in position. Utah has not won the offensive to defensive board category yet this season and typically loses by 11.7 rebounds per game. They were -16 vs Arizona (6th worst). The worst offensive to defensive rebounding game was -29 at UNLV. Utah was -16 free throw attempts for the game. Many people point to this category as the #1 reason Utah lost but they were -14 at Colorado and Utah won by 28 points, not always the case, even though the 26 fouls were a season high. Sure there were some bad calls but Utah lost on the defensive boards...mainly the free throw from York (yes I'm talking about you now Isaiah). That was a huge play. It put Arizona up 1 and took a lot of air out of Utah with 1:39 left. Utah went for a three :20 later and that was it, Utah never scored again. If York doesn't get the put back, Utah is up 1 and Arizona is playing from behind. Utah shot 30.9% 17/55 a season low. That is not going to win you games, especially when 5 of the misses were from point blank.

    I put the blame on all the fouls on Utah not the refs. They knew that Arizona was the aggressor in game 1 and they dominated. Last night Utah matched the aggression but that just increased the fouls. It did back Arizona down a bit but they are really just that good. Give it to Arizona, they let Delon do his thing and they decided to focus on taking Chapman, Tucker and Taylor out of the game. Whenever Chapman would get the ball you could clearly hear "SHOOTER" from their bench. They were focusing on taking Utah out of the three point game and forcing them inside where they wanted them. Great strategy.

    Utah will be fine, still going to the dance, maybe a 4 or even a 5 seed but they are a lock for the party.

  18. #138
    Administrator U-Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,526
    Quote Originally Posted by The Thrill View Post
    I put the blame on all the fouls on Utah not the refs. They knew that Arizona was the aggressor in game 1 and they dominated. Last night Utah matched the aggression but that just increased the fouls. It did back Arizona down a bit but they are really just that good. Give it to Arizona, they let Delon do his thing and they decided to focus on taking Chapman, Tucker and Taylor out of the game. Whenever Chapman would get the ball you could clearly hear "SHOOTER" from their bench. They were focusing on taking Utah out of the three point game and forcing them inside where they wanted them. Great strategy.
    I felt like we matched their physical play and intensity, but lost focus a couple of times because of it. Plus, you can only match their physical play from an effort standpoint. No matter how much effort you put out, it is hard to physically match guys like RHJ, Johnson, and Ashley.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Thrill View Post
    Utah will be fine, still going to the dance, maybe a 4 or even a 5 seed but they are a lock for the party.
    I believe Utah sweeps the state of Washington and gets to the semifinal round of the tournament and locks in a 3 seed. The only way they end up 5 is if they lose 1 on the road and lose the first game in the tournament. Which could happen if they let the Arizona game get into their heads. From what I've seen this year, however, I don't expect it. They always seem to bounce back well after losses.

  19. #139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Twin Falls, Idaho
    Posts
    3,405
    Quote Originally Posted by U-Ute View Post
    I felt like we matched their physical play and intensity, but lost focus a couple of times because of it. Plus, you can only match their physical play from an effort standpoint. No matter how much effort you put out, it is hard to physically match guys like RHJ, Johnson, and Ashley.



    I believe Utah sweeps the state of Washington and gets to the semifinal round of the tournament and locks in a 3 seed. The only way they end up 5 is if they lose 1 on the road and lose the first game in the tournament. Which could happen if they let the Arizona game get into their heads. From what I've seen this year, however, I don't expect it. They always seem to bounce back well after losses.
    We're not getting a 3 seed without beating Arizona in Vegas, and we probably had to beat them in SLC, too. It's a pipedream to suggest otherwise. Without beating Arizona (or losing to someone else), a 5 seed is quite possible.

    Lunardi's current three seeds vs. the RPI top 25 and 50 vs. Utah

    Oklahoma 4-4 and 9-4

    Iowa State 4-5 and 9-5

    Notre Dame 2-3 and 4-4

    Maryland 2-1 and 6-4

    Utah 1-4 and 2-5

  20. #140
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalPat View Post
    We're not getting a 3 seed without beating Arizona in Vegas, and we probably had to beat them in SLC, too. It's a pipedream to suggest otherwise. Without beating Arizona (or losing to someone else), a 5 seed is quite possible.
    Yes, you don't give out 3 seeds to teams with only one big win.

    Something Utah has that the other teams you list do not have - a clean slate in terms of bad losses.

    Oklahoma has a loss to Creighton (RPI 125) and one to UW (105). Both very bad. One to KState (76).

    Iowa State lost to S. Carolina (95), Texas Tech (171), and KState (76).

    Notre Dame is like us with better wins. Their worst loss is to Syracuse (57)

    Maryland's worst loss is to Illinois (59).

  21. #141
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Twin Falls, Idaho
    Posts
    3,405
    Quote Originally Posted by sancho View Post
    Yes, you don't give out 3 seeds to teams with only one big win.

    Something Utah has that the other teams you list do not have - a clean slate in terms of bad losses.

    Oklahoma has a loss to Creighton (RPI 125) and one to UW (105). Both very bad. One to KState (76).

    Iowa State lost to S. Carolina (95), Texas Tech (171), and KState (76).

    Notre Dame is like us with better wins. Their worst loss is to Syracuse (57)

    Maryland's worst loss is to Illinois (59).
    Oklahoma, with 9 losses, certainly doesn't look a 3 seed from W-L. But that loss to Creighton was on the road, and the loss to UW came when Upshaw was still playing.

    To me, a bad loss is anything 150 or lower. Losing to 100-150 on the road isn't a resume killer in and of itself.

    Analytics say we're a 3 seed, but that incorporates MOV and that doesn't say a whole lot when considering we're in the No. 6 league for RPI. I'd be happy with a 4 seed.

  22. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalPat View Post
    Oklahoma, with 9 losses, certainly doesn't look a 3 seed from W-L. But that loss to Creighton was on the road, and the loss to UW came when Upshaw was still playing.

    To me, a bad loss is anything 150 or lower. Losing to 100-150 on the road isn't a resume killer in and of itself.

    Analytics say we're a 3 seed, but that incorporates MOV and that doesn't say a whole lot when considering we're in the No. 6 league for RPI. I'd be happy with a 4 seed.

    I agree with you. We are a 4. But I do think we get a 3 if we win out from here. That would add a top 10 win and a top 50. Plus, the committee always overreacts to conference tournaments.

    I have a different system since I don't trust the RPI. To me, a good win is a win over a bubble team or better. A bad loss is a loss to a team that is outside of the bubble. It doesn't change much either way. The committee values strong wins much more than it values the absence of bad losses.

  23. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCalPat View Post
    Oklahoma, with 9 losses
    The Big12 is brutal. There are only two bad teams in the entire conference.

  24. #144
    Senior Member Scorcho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    right here, right now
    Posts
    1,448
    with as many as 5 games left to play before the NCAA's, there is just too much in play. I can see anywhere from a #2 to a #9.

    - If Utah finishes 5-0 I suspect they would get a #3 seed (with help there's an outside chance at a #2). Let's be honest, if Utah faces AZ on a neutral court, they'll lose by 10-15 points.

    - 0-3 and Utah's probably an #8 or #9 seed, I just can't envision Utah losing to UW. They seemed to have quit in Seattle.

    - 4-1 with a loss in the championship game equates a #4.

  25. #145
    Senior Member Scorcho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    right here, right now
    Posts
    1,448
    also it does seem like preference is given to teams that have fared well in the past few years in the tourney (which Utah does not have).

  26. #146
    Sam the Sheepdog LA Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    17,726
    My gut feeling is that this team does not lack character, just experience. It seems to me unlikely that they fall apart now. But I do think we'll probably end up a 4 unless a light goes on in their collective head and they tear through the rest of their schedule and toe conference tournament.

    "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
    --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

    "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold."
    --Yeats

    “True, we [lawyers] build no bridges. We raise no towers. We construct no engines. We paint no pictures - unless as amateurs for our own principal amusement. There is little of all that we do which the eye of man can see. But we smooth out difficulties; we relieve stress; we correct mistakes; we take up other men's burdens and by our efforts we make possible the peaceful life of men in a peaceful state.”

    --John W. Davis, founder of Davis Polk & Wardwell

  27. #147

    Top 60 Players ranked by efficiency in Pac12

    Player FG% 3P% FT% Points Rebounds Assists Blocks Steals Ast/To
    1 Delon Wright Utah 51.7% 32.2% 82.4% 14.3 4.6 5.3 0.9 2.2 2.98
    2 Gary Payton II Oregon State 48.7% 29.5% 67.7% 13.3 7.5 3.2 1.2 3.1 1.64
    3 Josh Hawkinson WSU 48.7% 20.0% 85.5% 14.6 10.9 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.00
    4 Joseph Young Oregon 44.0% 35.2% 91.8% 19.8 4.5 3.7 0.0 1.1 1.60
    5 Tyrone Wallace California 42.6% 30.4% 60.4% 17.0 7.4 3.8 0.3 1.3 1.33
    6 Nigel Williams-Goss Washington 44.0% 24.4% 76.7% 15.4 4.6 6.1 0.2 1.1 2.13
    7 Anthony Brown Stanford 43.0% 45.0% 76.9% 15.2 7.3 2.8 0.3 0.7 1.47
    8 Kevon Looney UCLA 47.4% 44.4% 64.1% 12.3 9.5 1.5 1.0 1.3 1.07
    9 Robert Upshaw Washington 59.3% 0.0% 43.4% 10.9 8.2 0.5 4.5 0.4 0.38
    10 Chasson Randle Stanford 39.9% 35.3% 90.7% 19.4 3.4 3.1 0.2 1.5 1.51
    11 Stanley Johnson Arizona 44.9% 34.6% 74.1% 14.1 6.8 1.8 0.3 1.5 0.78
    12 Josh Scott Colorado 50.3% 33.3% 76.1% 12.6 7.6 1.1 2.0 0.6 1.29
    13 Norman Powell UCLA 45.4% 31.3% 73.2% 16.3 4.7 2.0 0.3 1.9 0.94
    14 Bryce Alford UCLA 39.3% 36.4% 83.8% 15.5 3.1 5.1 0.0 1.0 2.04
    15 T.J. McConnell Arizona 49.4% 33.3% 72.7% 9.7 3.8 6.0 0.1 2.1 2.98
    16 Rondae Hollis-Jefferson Arizona 52.5% 23.8% 69.9% 11.1 6.7 1.5 0.9 1.1 0.88
    17 Elgin Cook Oregon 52.2% 22.2% 73.2% 13.1 5.4 1.7 0.2 1.1 0.78
    18 Askia Booker Colorado 39.6% 35.5% 82.8% 17.4 3.2 3.1 0.1 1.4 1.31
    19 Stefan Nastic Stanford 47.6% 0.0% 72.8% 13.6 6.6 1.4 1.1 0.4 0.76
    20 Andrew Andrews Washington 39.9% 37.2% 82.2% 14.5 4.4 2.3 0.0 1.5 1.15
    21 Nikola Jovanovic USC 51.4% 15.4% 63.9% 12.3 7.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.23
    22 David Kravish California 47.6% 28.6% 70.2% 11.2 6.9 1.2 1.5 0.4 0.82
    23 Savon Goodman ASU 57.1% 0.0% 58.8% 10.8 7.1 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.33
    24 Jakob Poeltl Utah 67.1% 0.0% 42.2% 8.5 7.1 0.6 1.9 0.4 0.37
    25 DaVonte Lacy WSU 41.3% 33.0% 76.4% 17.3 2.9 2.2 0.1 0.7 1.13
    26 Julian Jacobs USC 50.8% 28.1% 70.0% 8.5 4.2 3.4 0.4 1.1 1.33
    27 Dillon Brooks Oregon 44.6% 31.9% 82.2% 11.4 4.9 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.85
    28 Eric Jacobsen ASU 63.8% 0.0% 57.3% 8.8 6.3 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.59
    29 Mike Anderson Washington 43.7% 38.3% 70.1% 8.0 6.1 2.4 0.5 0.9 1.17
    30 Jordan Bell Oregon 58.9% 0.0% 50.0% 5.2 6.4 1.5 2.8 0.9 1.47
    31 Tony Parker UCLA 54.2% 0.0% 54.5% 10.9 6.8 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.28
    32 Wesley Gordon Colorado 53.8% 28.6% 69.2% 7.1 7.3 1.1 1.5 0.4 0.88
    33 Brandon Taylor Utah 45.5% 43.7% 87.0% 10.4 2.5 3.5 0.0 1.2 2.45
    34 Jordan McLaughlin USC 35.2% 27.2% 65.2% 12.1 3.0 4.5 0.2 1.5 2.00
    35 Jordan Mathews California 45.3% 45.1% 79.3% 14.2 3.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.95
    36 Kaleb Tarczewski Arizona 59.1% 0.0% 70.0% 9.1 5.1 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.16
    37 Malcolm Duvivier Oregon State 36.4% 30.8% 73.4% 10.5 2.9 3.5 0.1 1.2 1.25
    38 Gerry Blakes ASU 40.5% 28.9% 80.3% 11.1 4.3 1.8 0.1 0.8 0.74
    39 Brandon Ashley Arizona 48.0% 35.3% 63.9% 11.2 5.2 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.44
    40 Shaquielle McKissic ASU 43.2% 34.7% 63.8% 11.1 4.1 1.9 0.1 1.4 1.38
    41 Isaac Hamilton UCLA 38.0% 37.0% 69.0% 10.1 3.6 3.1 0.2 0.9 1.35
    42 Xavier Johnson Colorado 42.8% 36.6% 65.1% 10.7 5.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.33
    43 Dwayne Benjamin Oregon 45.8% 37.9% 44.9% 8.7 5.9 1.1 0.4 0.8 1.45
    44 Ike Iroegbu WSU 44.2% 33.8% 74.0% 8.4 2.7 3.1 0.1 0.5 1.61
    45 Rosco Allen Stanford 44.1% 41.0% 62.2% 8.4 4.8 1.4 0.3 0.6 1.06
    46 Jabari Bird California 43.7% 33.3% 76.7% 10.5 3.3 2.0 0.5 0.4 1.81
    47 Shawn Kemp Jr. Washington 60.1% 0.0% 59.7% 9.9 3.7 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.20
    48 Katin Reinhardt USC 36.6% 37.8% 82.5% 12.4 2.5 1.8 0.2 1.0 0.93
    49 Jordan Loveridge Utah 41.6% 44.0% 87.0% 9.9 3.8 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.50
    50 Langston Morris-Walker Oregon State 36.5% 31.0% 70.5% 9.4 4.7 1.5 0.1 0.9 1.13
    51 Victor Robbins Oregon State 46.1% 30.3% 70.9% 10.3 3.5 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.53
    52 Jaron Hopkins Colorado 48.5% 37.1% 56.3% 6.5 3.5 1.4 0.2 1.0 0.77
    53 Darion Clark USC 44.1% 0.0% 54.9% 5.9 5.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.54
    54 Tra Holder ASU 31.4% 28.2% 73.0% 6.9 1.9 3.5 0.0 0.6 1.42
    55 Olaf Schaftenaar Oregon State 39.2% 36.8% 79.5% 7.5 3.3 1.6 0.3 0.5 1.20
    56 Ny Redding WSU 41.4% 24.0% 80.3% 4.5 1.9 3.6 0.1 0.6 1.82
    57 Jarmal Reid Oregon State 44.3% 20.0% 73.3% 8.2 2.8 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.82
    58 Gabe York Arizona 43.2% 37.2% 79.4% 9.1 2.1 1.3 0.4 0.5 1.44
    59 Reid Travis Stanford 46.9% 0.0% 48.1% 6.1 5.7 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.59
    60 Jernard Jarreau Washington 41.7% 33.3% 60.0% 4.8 4.8 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.91

  28. #148
    Administrator U-Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,526
    I think the only surprise in this list is seeing Alford above McConnell.

    That's hard to swallow.

  29. #149
    Quote Originally Posted by U-Ute View Post
    I think the only surprise in this list is seeing Alford above McConnell.

    That's hard to swallow.
    It's mostly because he scores so much, they are pretty even. Plus UCLA had the toughest schedule in the entire Pac12...he gets bonus points for that right? Losing to Kentucky by 40 points though is hardly salvageable.

    Alford has had 7 20+ point games including a 28 6/11 from deep game early in the season.
    Just because he went 0-10 vs Utah (by far his worst game) doesn't make him a bad player.
    He's had double digit assists twice and a couple of 4 steal games. He's put up good numbers vs good teams.
    Last edited by The Thrill; 03-06-2015 at 06:32 PM.

  30. #150
    Administrator U-Ute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,526
    Surely the equation takes into account a d-baggery factor?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •