I don't think this criticism is a fair or accurate criticism of Whit. As I've said, I was once suspicious that this was happening but am not any longer.
Ditto (A) above. I don't think I've ever said this. I'm not sure how widespread this view really is. It is kind of a ridiculous idea, I think. Would Kruger have been better at QB than at DE? Could Devonte Christopher have played QB? I don't think so. I've said that if Chase Hansen can be an NFL-quality safety but only an average PAC-12 QB, he should play safety.B)that quarterback is a mess because of moving them to defense
I don't think he has done this. I think that he is either the unluckiest HC we've ever seen when it comes to hiring OCs, or that he has simply bungled that aspect of his job. Maybe it's both. It certainly looks like a mess and the offensive results stink. When I add those facts -- and that's what I think they are -- to Whit's passion for defense and the undeniably superb defenses he's been able to put together, I do wonder if he doesn't need to "get religion" about the offense. He's a very smart guy. He can figure this out. It's his job.C) that he changes OC's on a whim,
Maybe. The above is what I think about (A), (B) and (C). I think a lot of knowledgeable fans, who care a lot about the program, and who are critical of his approach to offense think the same way.These points have been ignorantly repeated enough times by many, including you, that they have taken on a life of their own, and are now deemed "facts" by ignorant fans.