It sounds like a noble and practical goal, but how realistic is it?

I took the top two pass catchers from each Pac-12 team last year and tallied their catches.

Arizona: 142
ASU: 98
Cal: 102
CU: 78
Oregon: 77 (Had seven with 20 or more catches)
Oregon State: 158
Stanford: 110 (Pretty sure top two were a TE and RB)
UCLA: 106
USC: 184 (Marquis Lee alone had 118)
Utah: 69
Washington: 146
WSU: 105

We can debate how much impact a 100-catch Scott-Dres season would have on our offense all day long. I think it would make the offense better by about 3-6 points per game. But where I get excited is that Scott-Dres could have their 100 combine catches, yet do not rank 1-2 on the team because of the presence of Jake Murphy.

In any event, I think it's a reachable goal that's going to depend on other things around them (tempo from the booth, Wilson's arm, score/clock, etc.). Will it result in improved W-L? Tough to say since it's pretty clear (or at least for last season, anyway) there's little if any correlation between W-L and having two players combine for 100 catches.