I'm no lawyer, but the binding arbitration clause in their terms of use that is currently on their site currently states in the first clause that it applies to the registering or purchasing their products and services. Plus there is no actual verification on that form that the individual is the one doing the verification, so I doubt that counts as registering or purchasing their product or even acceptance of the agreement. In other words I don't think submitting an inquiry on their site would prohibit you from participating in a class-action lawsuit, and it almost certainly wouldn't hold up in court.
And many others agree with you, yet after saying the clause is unenforceable the NY Attorney General still said it needs to be removed. And a former NJ Deputy AG says entering information may bind you to one of the two clauses, and if you accept the credit monitoring you're almost certainly bound.
Beyond all that, people are reporting you can enter obviously bogus information and have it tell you your info was breached, so it seems pointless to check.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, this is interesting.
https://twitter.com/zackwhittaker/st...47688768905216