It is just an average. The wording is misleading, but they clarified yesterday. It's not a huge change, but it's probably wiser to make incremental changes than huge changes.
Type: Posts; User: sancho
It is just an average. The wording is misleading, but they clarified yesterday. It's not a huge change, but it's probably wiser to make incremental changes than huge changes.
I think our schedule would have been the same. That's what twitter was saying anyway. The average net of our opponents met the 175 standard.
I'm pretty sure most of the legislature doesn't know what UVU, SUU, and WSU stand for.
Good news. I might be in SLC for that, too!
The tail wags the dog. Instead of fixing the criteria, we force conferences to gyrate and contort in attempts to game the criteria.
Me too.
The situation that would leave us wringing our hands is if we have a great season and get left out of the playoff in favor of teams that played tougher OOC schedules. It's a fairly unlikely scenario,...
He's right. It's not a good schedule. You can still argue that it's a good strategy, though. We've had that debate.
These sound like obstacles that can be overcome.
It will probably not ever make TV revenue like the ACC/BigTen Challenge, but it will certainly make more than Utah/High Point. These games replace...
I used to push for a Pac-12 Big12 challenge, but the Big-12 partnered up with the SEC. Now, I've been pushing the Pac-12/BigEast challenge. Right coast, left coast. East v West. It's a lot of travel...
You're kidding, right?