The Supreme Court ruled on procedural grounds in the baker case that allow Colorado to go through it all again if it chooses.
Here is the language added to the Utah law:
34A-5-111.Application to the freedom of expressive association and the free
688 exercise of religion.
689 This chapter may not be interpreted to infringe upon the freedom of expressive
690 association or the free exercise of religion protected by the First Amendment of the United
691 States Constitution and Article I, Sections 1, 4, and 15 of the Utah Constitution.
692 Section 10. Section 34A-5-112 is enacted to read:
693 34A-5-112.Religious liberty protections -- Expressing beliefs and commitments in
694 workplace -- Prohibition on employment actions against certain employee speech.
695 (1) An employee may express the employee's religious or moral beliefs and
696 commitments in the workplace in a reasonable, non-disruptive, and non-harassing way on
697 equal terms with similar types of expression of beliefs or commitments allowed by the
698 employer in the workplace, unless the expression is in direct conflict with the essential
699 business-related interests of the employer.
700 (2) An employer may not discharge, demote, terminate, or refuse to hire any person, or
701 retaliate against, harass, or discriminate in matters of compensation or in terms, privileges, and
702 conditions of employment against any person otherwise qualified, for lawful expression or
703 expressive activity outside of the workplace regarding the person's religious, political, or
704 personal convictions, including convictions about marriage, family, or sexuality, unless the
705 expression or expressive activity is in direct conflict with the essential business-related
706 interests of the employer.
I don't know if there were any problems with this prior to this change in the law. I really don't have any problem with this as long as it applies equally to matters in addition to religion. As a former employment law lawyer, I see this as almost impossible to enforce. Essential business related interests must include image, profit, and workplace harmony. Then again, plaintiff lawyers never lack for creativity.
I think the LDS Church should get out of the wedding business. From a religious standpoint, I believe mixing the wedding stuff with a sacred ordinance many times makes sacred ordinance second to all of the wedding stuff.